Christian Psychic Readings & Astrology Charts for All Faiths

Doctor Tells Us What Happens to Your Blood When You Take The Jabber

https://rumble.com/vkwmw7-dr.-jane-ruby-injected-with-a-poison-blood-proof-stew-peters-show.html

72 thoughts on “Doctor Tells Us What Happens to Your Blood When You Take The Jabber

  1. amiannNeptune21

    Got a real bad feeling about these vaccines. The stuff that really freaks me out are the women who just bleed, crazy menstrual changes etc….. and if you even question a little bit “is this safe for me?” You get ridiculed …. Frightening times.

  2. amiannKenneth

    The video might have some credibility if the blood samples were a before and after slide shot from the same person instead of comparing blood samples from two different people. This is great fodder for Venus square Neptune folk! I think I’d rather take the RNA vaccine than gasp for air on a ventilator tube stuck down my throat. Besides, the more people who refuse to vaccinate only allows this pandemic to flourish and mutate.

    1. amiannChristine Kai

      I agree with you, Kenneth! I took the Moderna vaccine in March & April and didn’t get the funky side effects that others might have had. I will take my chances with the vaccine instead of dying of Covid.

        1. amiannKenneth

          amiann,
          In present day intensive care units, you will see they’re filled not only with elderly patients, but also with younger people as the delta variant affects younger age groups more. Nearly all COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. now are in people who weren’t vaccinated. This is an astonishing demonstration of how effective the vaccines have been and an indication that deaths per day —currently in the thousands for the US — could be practically zero if everyone eligible got the vaccine.

    2. amiannJ

      I don’t think these people would agree with you. By the way, even if you type the whole name of this facebook group into the search feature on facebook it doesn’t show initially. You have to click on ‘show more’ before you find it. And if you want to find similar groups where people can share what is happening to them when they have a reaction to the vaccine, searching keywords like ‘vaccine side effects’ or ‘vaccine injury’ takes you to the same page with the same government advice. There aren’t even a selection of groups that you can choose from like there normally is when you search for a group. There is no easy to find platform for people to discuss their reactions to the vaccine. It’s very hard to find the facebook groups where people can share their accounts of what has happened to them. So bear that in mind when you’re scrolling through the many devastating accounts:

      https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068922816380

      1. amiannKenneth

        The reason you will not find many groups is that the vaccines are shown to work, and discouraging people not to take the vaccine is simply too costly in human life and suffering. The statistics simply prove that you are wrong, with the present number of hospital admissions. Observing and proving side effects can sometimes be very difficult. Society cannot achieve herd-immunity until sufficient people are vaccinated.
        Even if there are a number of individuals who react to the vaccines,, I would surmise that the overall rate is significantly lower than the death rate to the virus as the hospitals are filled with covid cases and not vaccine reactions.
        BTW, Posting links to discredited comments nullifies your point of view.

  3. amiannTiffany

    There’s a reason why Stew Peters show was removed from YouTube. Don’t get your news from people like this. Get it from reliable sources like NPR that require their authors to have credibility.

    1. amiannS

      Anyone with a different opinion or questions the government runs the risk of having videos deleted, being suspended and removed altogether. This is called deplatforming and it’s censorship. There are plenty of these same people that also say disgusting things about women, but I just ignore it and go about my day. You don’t have to agree with everyone and if you don’t want to support it, then don’t. We need to stop taking everything personally. With the cancel culture we live in today, eventually everyone will say something deemed offensive and go through public shame.

      NPR is funded by our tax dollars. There’s no credibility there. They say exactly what they are paid to say by our government.

  4. amiannS

    This is insanity. The extreme push for the vaccine and daily threats make me question a lot of things. I’ll take my chances for a virus with an extremely high survival rate. If you aren’t morbidly obese and don’t have type 2 diabetes, heart disease and other comorbidities, then you are already ahead of the curve. You can purchase zinc, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin d if you feel it’s serious.

    I’m so glad that I worked and saved my money during this “pandemic” so I can move out of this horrible state soon. I’m sure the state government will eventually make the vaccine mandatory. All this will do is drive people out of here and create a black market for fake vaccination papers. I see businesses suffering because they can’t hire anyone and the lack of customers. They are already backtracking by saying that they just need a proof of a negative covid test.

      1. amiannKenneth

        There is no way to verify this. Even if these cases are true, compare these numbers to the incidence of covid admissions to hospitals and the rate of vaccinations for those admitted. The statistics are not on your side.

        1. amiannJ

          Who’s verifying all the ‘covid 19 deaths’ then? Did you know that everyone who goes to the hospital is tested for covid first regardless the reason why they are coming to hospital and if they test positive (by the fake pcr test) then whatever happens to that person, whether they die from other causes or are occupying a hospital bed, they will be a ‘verified’ covid statistic? And did you know that hospitals are getting financial incentives for covid positive patients? So if someone dies and they are a ‘covid patient’ the hospital gets money. But if they are registered as dying from other causes, the hospital does not get the money. And would you then believe me that the opposite holds true for vaccine related issues/deaths? Would that make sense to you?

          1. amiannKenneth

            Are you making this up as you go along? Are you a medical professional?

            PCR tests are very accurate when properly performed by a health care professional, but the rapid test can miss some cases, but the percentage is actually quite low.

  5. amiannTisha

    I had Covid and lived. I would rather suffer through it again than get a vaccine that might have even worse side effects. Of course, I believe the same people creating the vaccines had a hand in manufacturing it. Yes, in a lab.

    1. amiannamiann Post author

      YEP I had it too for 2 weeks. I did not have it bad. My chest was really tight and that was a little scary and I was tired. I was very glad I did not smoke. I can see how it could take out smokers

  6. amiannKenneth

    Jane Ruby has a doctorate in psychology, NOT medicine.
    Ruby advanced claims that over 99% of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine consists of graphene oxide which is toxic to the human body. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has posted an ingredient list for the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine on its website. So, has the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and contains no graphene oxide.
    Any scientist in the world could test the vaccine’s ingredients, which they have, and no graphene oxide has been found.
    Much of the basis for negating the vaccine’s are unfortunately political which is very sad.

    1. amiannJ

      ‘Argentine Scientists – Spectroscopy Analysis Reveals 99.5% Graphene Oxide In Moderna Vaccination Vial!!
      In a new interview for Palabras y Verdades, La Quinta Columna clarified the doubt about the percentage of graphene oxide in the vaccination vials. When they talked about it being present in 99% or almost 100%, they were referring specifically to what is obtained after analyzing the contents employing the spectroscopy technique. It is not that the whole vial is graphene, but that when the liquid is purified, the signals obtained from this filtrate show that it is 99.5% graphene.’

      The above is taken from: https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/absorption-signal.html?m=1

          1. amiannKenneth

            Yes, and I am immunologically compromised with chronic partial ACTH deficiency (Mars inconjunct Uranus, with Saturn conjunct Ascendant). I took both Moderna shots with no problem.

    1. amiannKenneth

      It is really sad that you appear to be on a mission to destroy lives when all of the statistics suggest that the vaccines are working. You can post all of the sites promoting conspiracy theories but it does not negate the fact that real science is against all of the arguments you are propagating.

          1. amiannJ

            Interesting. Did you read all the article?

            This is the final paragraph:

            “The American people are unruly and in a sour mood about their authority figures. The 40 percent of people who reported their initial hesitance have barely budged so far — despite millions wasted on public education and ham-fisted attempts to prevent them from sharing their concerns and fears. If vaccine advocates really do want vaccination uptake to increase more than they want to feel superior, they have to change course.”

            Also the irony in that article is repulsive. There is a heading at the start of the article that says “Vaccine resisters can’t be persuaded if they feel disrespected.” Then in the third paragraph says: “Proponents of the vaccine are unwilling or unable to understand the thinking of vaccine skeptics — or even admit that skeptics may be thinking at all.” Wow, real respect being shown there. More quotes that only show the author is the moron (since it contradicts their original statement about respect): “For vaccine proponents, it feels like lowering themselves to answer people they believe to be less intelligent.” and “So the idea of doing more intellectual work to answer people you think are morons, or are arguing in bad faith, is simply beyond them.” and most disturbingly when the author says how “The Skeptic” shows “irrationality” when they say this: “There are no long-term studies, and I’m worried about possible long-term effects.”

    1. amiannKenneth

      This is not so much a video conference, but one individual giving a subjective analysis of what he considers is going on. Where is the rebuttal or questioning of his hypothesis. While it could be that one in a million people may react to a specific vaccine due to a rare condition, there are alternatives to the RNA version like the J&J one.
      Blowing out of all proportion the facts about covid vaccines is not helping society.
      This is the kind of tactic that the political left and right employ on many news media stations; to present a partial fact to convey a biased truth.

  7. amiannJ

    Another good video, listen to these honest decent people:

    ‘Michael Green has filed a class action lawsuit initially representing 1,200 first responders against the Governor’s vaccine mandates with thousands more expected to join.

    Honolulu Fire Captain Kaimi Pelekai gives an emotional testimony about losing his job because he doesn’t want to put this experimental vaccine in his body after spending the last year taking care of COVID-19 patients.

    Attorney Sean Williams says that there are already effective treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

    And, according to the CDC, it is unnecessary to test asymptomatic people because they do not spread the virus.’:

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/YuNZBGeMWlEn/

    1. amiannKenneth

      You really don’t get it it seems. Where are the vast majority of vaccine related problems in hospitals compared to covid cases. These individuals hear about the possible reaction to getting the vaccine and blow this out of all proportion. Again, statistics are not on your side.

      1. amiannJ

        I personally know someone whose family member has been having horrendous side effects after the vaccine and every time they mention the vaccine the medical professionals become very defensive, and do not make it clear how they should go ahead and report what is happening to the relevant authority. I’ve heard many other accounts of this online about how difficult it is to report side effects to the vaccine. Scientific statistics concerning covid and the vaccine should be reported with equal importance if it’s truly science. But it seems some statistics are more ‘equal’ than others.

        Now you can tell in what way I might be losing the debate this time

        P.S. Would could always discuss your chart

        1. amiannJ

          The last part should read:

          ‘Now you can tell me in what way exactly I am losing the debate this time.

          P.S. We could always discuss your chart’

          1. amiannKenneth

            So you are basing your opinion on knowing someone personal to you who has reacted to the vaccine. I’ve actually consulted with a company that developed software for reporting adverse reactions to medine to the FDA. Unfortunately, medical professionals are not required to report reactions, but any individual can do this online.
            Neither of us can make assertions as to how significant a covid reaction is without sufficient reported data. However, I will re-assert my point that the number of hospital patients with covid far outway the numbers admitted for vaccine reaction.
            I will admit that my responses have elevated to making you feel defensive, and chartwise can be attributed to having Saturn close to the ascendant and square my natal Sun which makes for being somewhat arrogant and rational. Are you willing to fess up about your Venus/Neptune?

          2. amiannJ

            >So you are basing your opinion on knowing someone personal to you who has reacted to >the vaccine.

            No I’m not basing it on that but on countless articles, discussions and accounts I’ve seen online and with a good helping of common sense.

            >I’ve actually consulted with a company that developed software for reporting adverse >reactions to medine to the FDA. Unfortunately, medical professionals are not required to >report reactions

            Interesting, that is what I have heard, thanks for confirming that.

            >but any individual can do this online

            Wow, how accurate (not) of the medical establishment in showing fair attempts of gathering such important data. So it’s left to people and their families, who no doubt are overwhelmed by the terrifying experience of the horrendous side effects those vaccines are causing, to report it themselves. Absolutely criminal!

            >Neither of us can make assertions as to how significant a covid reaction is without >sufficient reported data. However, I will re-assert my point that the number of hospital >patients with covid far outway the numbers admitted for vaccine reaction.

            You do realise that contradicts the first paragraph of your comment (where you say: “Unfortunately, medical professionals are not required to report reactions”)? The statistics are not being adequately and fairly reported! So they cannot be trusted!

            >I will admit that my responses have elevated to making you feel defensive, and chartwise >can be attributed to having Saturn close to the ascendant and square my natal Sun which >makes for being somewhat arrogant and rational.

            Interesting. That does make sense. I practice Hellenistic Astrology (since you have Saturn conjunct the ascendant, you might relate to the importance of listening to the way our ancestors approached astrology, since we inherited the tradition from them as they were the first to practice horoscopic astrology. There is now a lot of information available from that time period that was revealed thanks to Project Hindsight translating all those Greek texts) and in Hellenistic Astrology there is something called ‘sect’, which differentiates charts between being night or day. This was an important consideration because certain planets were thought to be with the night sect and others with the day sect. If it’s a day chart the the day sect planets are in power and if a night chart then the night sect planets are in power. Were you born in the day or night (i.e. is the Sun above the ASC/DSC axis or below it)?

            >Are you willing to fess up about your Venus/Neptune?

            Why would the connection between Venus and Neptune be so significant to you? And most importantly, what do you hope to achieve? To somehow dismiss someone with genuine RATIONAL and understandable concerns about an experimental vaccine? By wagging your finger and looking down your nose and saying “look they have their Venus and Neptune there, you can’t possibly take them seriously” – how many would view you as rational if you do that?!

  8. amiannKenneth

    In response to J:
    “How many are ‘nearly all covid-19 deaths’ and can you please cite your source?

    This is a typical answer from someone who is losing a debate. Perform your own google search on the string “more unvaccinated covid cases in hospitals”

    and it will return 44,000,000 results

    that initially suggest that 98% of patients were unvaccinated

    For more on younger people:
    https://www.healthline.com/health-news/young-people-make-up-biggest-group-of-newly-hospitalized-covid-19-patients

    1. amiannJ

      Actually you’re wrong. A typical answer from someone who is losing a debate involves a constant attempt to keep referencing that the other is losing the debate! Why the constant need to tell people if they’re losing a debate or not? But while we’re on the subject I think it far more likely a sign that someone is losing a debate when they have to make attempts to patronise and ridicule with comments like where is your Venus and Neptune in your chart and suggesting to find statistics via the amount of google search hits

      1. amiannKenneth

        Well, I’m not wrong and it is easy fro you to say so.
        First of all you made the references to erroneous sites that have been proven to be false. You then try to add more links to questionable sites that are definitely not mainstream.
        This is no longer a question of winning or losing a debate because neither of us are going to convince the other.
        One of the main conversations on this site is astrology, so I’m merely pointing out that someone with Venus/Neptune aspects are more likely to be subject to conspiracy theories, and you appear to be such a candidate.

        1. amiannJ

          Actually, if you look at the title to the article we are commenting on, I’d say I was right on topic and you are merely trying to dismiss my remarks based on one component of a natal chart.

          So basically you’re saying that if I send links to sites that aren’t mainstream then they have no worth? You do realise that there are many examples throughout history where the mainstream opinions at the time were wrong? For example, if you lived in Nazi Germany during the second world war, where do you think you’d stand with your opinions if you only listen to mainstream?

          You say “erroneous sites that have been proven to be false” – proven by who? If someone came to you and said I’m thinking of buying a vacuum cleaner, and I think I’ll go for this brand because on their website they only have good reviews. What would you say to them? Yes, get it if on their company website it only has good reviews. Or would you encourage them to investigate that brand elsewhere? What I would encourage you to do is ‘follow the money and power’. And look at what each side has to gain. You can listen to mainstream who are funded by big corporations like the drug companies pushing to sell their vaccines. Or you can listen to the many doctors and scientists brave enough to speak up, who are putting their careers and lives on the line. Many of them receive daily death threats for speaking up.

          1. amiannKenneth

            I’ve decided that I’m not going to play your game of creating numerous threads on this topic in an attempt to confuse the issue at hand. I directed the National Review article to you in an attempt for both of us to see where each of us were coming from.

            One of the reasons I have over-reacted is that you are a purveyor of misinformation which contributes in my being continually confined as the virus spreads creating pain and personal hardship not only for me, but for millions of people. I am unable to travel to see family and friends both nationally and internationally. I am restricted in what I can do outside, all because individuals like yourself want to voice an opinion that is without much merit. It’s one thing to fear having a vaccine, but it’s another if you don’t support that decision with the absence of self-isolating, social distancing and working together to beat this virus–which you have not shown.

            You continually attempt to see contradiction in statements rather than facts, or make a mountain out of a molehill. Although I initiated it, you continue to question me about my chart, but refuse to answer questions about yours. Do you have a control issue? BTW, I’m not trying to to dismiss your remarks based on one component of a natal chart, but I am implying that it may be a component that contributes to the illusion of how you perceive things.

            I’m tired of the nit-picking that this exchange has descended into, as you continually try to gain points in an unscientific manner. If you are unable to see that I have demonstrated that the article links you posted are erroneous and false, then there is no hope for you, and if your position is accepted by the mainstream, then sadly, we are destined to become a third-world country, where fear, anxiety, ignorance, poverty and division reign.

            I don’t, and cannot, prove anything to someone like yourself as you seem unwilling to accept certain precepts that form the basis of an advanced society, and by all means, go ahead and have the last word, it will satisfy your ego.

  9. amiannJ

    Who’s verifying all the ‘covid 19 deaths’ then? Did you know that everyone who goes to the hospital is tested for covid first regardless the reason why they are coming to hospital and if they test positive (by the fake pcr test) then whatever happens to that person, whether they die from other causes or are occupying a hospital bed, they will be a ‘verified’ covid statistic? And did you know that hospitals are getting financial incentives for covid positive patients? So if someone dies and they are a ‘covid patient’ the hospital gets money. But if they are registered as dying from other causes, the hospital does not get the money. And would you then believe me that the opposite holds true for vaccine related issues/deaths? Would that make sense to you?

  10. amiannKenneth

    It is painfully clear even to to most sceptical of rational humans, that the number of ICU covid cases is absolutely real. Trying to make a case for incorrectly listing the cause of death as not being covid is ridiculous, as most causes of death are multiple causes, but doctors usually list the primary cause.
    You really are showing yourself as a conspiracy theorist, simply because a scenario can exist. to you, it does. In the US, doctors face significant problems by falsifying medical documents, so convincing yourself of a conspiracy is part of who you are.
    I’d be interested to know how astrologically, Venus in your natal chart aspects Neptune
    BTW, There are far more unlisted cases of covid deaths in the world as many people cannot get hospital treatment.

  11. amiannMD Parise

    iI find it quite interesting that in the past month I know two fully vaccinated people (and not recently, we’re talking vaccinated 3 months ago) who contracted COVID and were hospitalized. This past weekend my cousin’s husband, also fully vaccinated, passed away due to COVID. My neighbor took the 1st shot four months ago and has been ill with unexplained blood pressure spikes and her diabetes is no longer controlled. She also has the most severe case of shingles her Dr. has seen in 21 years of practice. She’s been advised against taking the 2nd shot. I’ve lost track of the number of people I know who’ve ended up in ER with allergic reactions after being vaccinated. The media either minimizes it or refuses to acknowledge these situations. Not exactly comforting or trust building.

  12. amiannJ

    This is interesting for those who thought all the vaxx ingredients had been revealed and whether graphene oxide is in there:

    Dr Lee Proctor, PHD, Bsc, filed a Freedom of Information request with the Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in late July requesting the full nucleotide base sequence of the jabs. The official response, discussed in the 6 m video (2nd link), and in the thread available to read on the official website states that this info is protected under section 41 (exempt – info provided in confidence) and 42 (exempt – commercial interests):

    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/full_nucleotide_base_sequences_f_2#outgoing-1187029

    In a nutshell this means that the active ingredient has not been disclosed and will not be disclosed. The doctor, who says he has been in the industry 25 years, knows of no other example where the full chemical structure of the API for any drug product is not freely available in the public domain

    So it seems anyone connected with any of the companies involved can stand there and deny/lie about the inclusion of any rumoured ingredient because the API is protected under trade secrets, etc . For example, “there is no Graphene Oxide in the Pfizer vaccine” (for which a case file of info to the contrary has been steadily building for the past 5 weeks but is being shilled by the fact check bots despite the emerging evidence to the contrary):

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/LbkwzmaRgWhl/

  13. amiannJ

    This is interesting for those who thought all the vaxx ingredients had been revealed and whether graphene oxide is in there:

    Dr Lee Proctor, PHD, Bsc, filed a Freedom of Information request with the Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in late July requesting the full nucleotide base sequence of the jabs. The official response, discussed in the thread available to read on the official website states that this info is protected under section 41 (exempt – info provided in confidence) and 42 (exempt – commercial interests):

    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/full_nucleotide_base_sequences_f_2#outgoing-1187029

    In a nutshell this means that the active ingredient has not been disclosed and will not be disclosed. The doctor, who says he has been in the industry 25 years, knows of no other example where the full chemical structure of the API for any drug product is not freely available in the public domain

    So it seems anyone connected with any of the companies involved can stand there and deny/lie about the inclusion of any rumoured ingredient because the API is protected under trade secrets, etc . For example, “there is no Graphene Oxide in the Pfizer vaccine” (for which a case file of info to the contrary has been steadily building for the past 5 weeks but is being shilled by the fact check bots despite the emerging evidence to the contrary)

  14. amiannJ

    ‘The Oxford University study found that 90 days after a second shot of the Pfizer or Astrazeneca vaccine, their efficacy in preventing infections had slipped to 75% and 61% respectively. A British public health study has found that protection from either of the two most commonly used Covid-19 vaccines against the now prevalent Delta variant of the coronavirus weakens within three months.’ Read full article here:

    https://www.gbnews.uk/news/covid-british-study-shows-vaccine-efficacy-wanes-under-delta/118417

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *